linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 086/101] fs/hfsplus/extents.c: fix concurrent acess of alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  3 Dec 2014 12:26:48 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sougata Santra <sougata@...era.com>,
	Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 086/101] fs/hfsplus/extents.c: fix concurrent acess of alloc_blocks

From: Sougata Santra <sougata@...era.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit d7bdb996aef67ea24c62707ca4e29b07025e9683 upstream.

Concurrent access to alloc_blocks in hfsplus_inode_info() is protected
by extents_lock mutex.  This patch fixes two instances where
alloc_blocks modification was not protected with this lock.

This fixes possible allocation bitmap corruption in race conditions
while extending and truncating files.

[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: take extents_lock before taking a copy of ->alloc_blocks]
[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: remove now-unused label `out']
Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@...era.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
Cc: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 fs/hfsplus/extents.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c b/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
index fbb212fbb1ef..f0f601c83ad6 100644
--- a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
+++ b/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
@@ -498,11 +498,13 @@ int hfsplus_file_extend(struct inode *inode)
 			goto insert_extent;
 	}
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
 	if (!res) {
 		hip->alloc_blocks += len;
+		mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
 		hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(inode, HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY);
+		return 0;
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
 	return res;
 
 insert_extent:
@@ -556,11 +558,13 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode *inode)
 
 	blk_cnt = (inode->i_size + HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->alloc_blksz - 1) >>
 			HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->alloc_blksz_shift;
+
+	mutex_lock(&hip->extents_lock);
+
 	alloc_cnt = hip->alloc_blocks;
 	if (blk_cnt == alloc_cnt)
-		goto out;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
-	mutex_lock(&hip->extents_lock);
 	res = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->ext_tree, &fd);
 	if (res) {
 		mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
@@ -592,10 +596,10 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode *inode)
 		hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
 	}
 	hfs_find_exit(&fd);
-	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
 
 	hip->alloc_blocks = blk_cnt;
-out:
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
 	hip->phys_size = inode->i_size;
 	hip->fs_blocks = (inode->i_size + sb->s_blocksize - 1) >>
 		sb->s_blocksize_bits;
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/