[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203125545.GX7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:55:45 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Jianqun <xjq@...k-chips.com>, Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.de, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add support for grabbing output
clock to codec
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:18:35PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> You still seem to be missing versions in your subject line and missing
> info on what changed version to version. The latest version you just
> sent (v4?) is still missing it.
> Unless Mark says so then I don't think you need to spin this series,
> but please try to add that in the future.
Don't resubmit. I actually don't care much about any of that stuff and
mostly ignore it unless the change set is saying something other than
"addressed review comments".
One thing you should avoid doing is posting new versions in reply to old
versions as has been done here, that just makes for a confusing and hard
to follow mail archive with new serieses buried in the middle of threads.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists