lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547F0F2A.3060708@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:24:58 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, backports@...r.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CodingStyle: add some more error handling guidelines

> Sorry.  I misread your email.  If the code looks like this:
> 
> 	foo = kmalloc();
> 	if (!foo)
> 		goto kmalloc_failed;
> 
> The "kmalloc_failed" doesn't add any information.

I find that this such a name approach would fit to your
expectation of a source-oriented labeling of these identifiers.


> We can see that kmalloc failed from the context.

Which name pattern do you find more appropriate in such
an use case?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ