[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203143029.GF32117@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:30:29 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: compute wait_ioctl timeout
correctly
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:54:13AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:36:22PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> +static inline unsigned long nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(const u64 m)
> >> +{
> >> + u64 usecs = div_u64(m + 999, 1000);
> >> + unsigned long j = usecs_to_jiffies(usecs);
> >> +
> >> + return min_t(unsigned long, MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET, j + 1);
> >
> > Or more concisely and review friendly:
> >
> > static inline unsigned long nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(const u64 n)
> > {
> > return min_t(u64, MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET, nsecs_to_jiffies64(n) + 1);
> > }
>
> Yea. This looks much nicer. Seems generic enough it might be better
> added next to nsec_to_jiffies64() in kernel/time/time.c or jiffies.h
> rather then in a driver header.
Ok, that needs an EXPORT_SYMBOL for nsecs_to_jiffies64. Can I count your
"Yea" above as an ack for adding that and pulling it in through
drm-intel.git?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists