[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203145542.GC16138@saruman>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:55:42 -0600
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
CC: <balbi@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] i2c: omap: add trace
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:52:18PM +0300, Alexander Kochetkov wrote:
>
> 03 дек. 2014 г., в 17:49, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> написал(а):
>
> > NAK, if you want to add traces, use, well, tracepoints :-) It makes no
> > sense to hack stuff like this.
>
> It's for testing only the problem reported not for upstream :)
> The hack stuff like this is to allow for me to see what happens on the Tony's board.
> I don't have omap2430 board.
oh alright, you might want to make it clear by adding "not for merging"
somewhere in the patch. Also, tracepoints would be something that can be
merged upstream *and* can be used for testing when necessary.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists