linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix kdump failures with crashkernel=high

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141203151928.GC23163@dhcp-17-37.nay.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2014 23:19:28 +0800
From:	WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix kdump failures with crashkernel=high

Hi,

On 12/03/14 at 11:35am, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:01:23PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> >From your experience It seems like swiotlb isn't working well with
> > crashkernel=X,high alone. What about using crashkernel=X,low with
> > crashkernel=X,high? Is there any reason you have to use
> > crashkernel=X,high alone?
> 
> Sure, when I specify an additional crashkernel=X,low then I can get
> things to work this way too. But my patch-set is about changing the
> default, since the failure was seen on common server systems with the
> defaults.

crashkernel=X doesn't work for you?

> 
> > crashkernel=X,high shouldn't automatically reserve 72M low at the first
> > place. Now it's going insane if you increase it to 256M by default.
> 
> How should a kernel without some low memory (which has only memory above
> 4G available) handle any 32bit DMA devices? There would be no way to
> allocate DMA-able memory for those devices.

I mean crashkernel=X,high shouldn't automatically reserve low.
crashkernel=X,high should always be used together with
crashkernel=X,low.

If one is not satisfied with the combination of two parameters,
crashkernel=X should be able to look for a suitable area below 4G. But
right now, crashkernel=X only deals under 896M.

I've sent a patch for this in the past:
[PATCH] x86, kdump: crashkernel=X try to reserve below 896M first, then try below 4G, then MAXMEM
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/14/183

X86 people don't like this idea so I didn't update the patch even
there's minor nit to clean up.

> 
> And as I said, if people prefer it I can change the patch-set so that
> the amount of low-memory allocated is subtracted from the amount of
> high-memory. This way the overall memory usage for kdump would stay the
> same while changing the defaults to work on more systems.

Say you do this, crashkernel=X,high would be reserve (X-n) high and (n)
low? IMHO I think it's better crashkernel=X,high means reserve X high
and high only.

Thanks
WANG Chao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/