linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net] bpf: x86: fix epilogue generation for eBPF programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMEtUuwKk4zg6=RbORfQoAzU9C5dkv1ufhabMhfwSdRX+iB3tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2014 07:51:25 -0800
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] bpf: x86: fix epilogue generation for eBPF programs

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Alexei,
>
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
>> classic BPF has a restriction that last insn is always BPF_RET.
>> eBPF doesn't have BPF_RET instruction and this restriction.
>> It has BPF_EXIT insn which can appear anywhere in the program
>> one or more times and it doesn't have to be last insn.
>
> Just to confirm, in valid eBPF, BPF_EXIT *must* be present at least
> once, correct?
> Does an eBPF JIT implementation need to check for it?

yes. of course. At least one bpf_exit is always there
and there are no loops. verifier is checking for it.
So no need for jit to check it again.

> I'll cook up a patch for arm64 if you haven't already done so.
> Any related test case I should run through?

Pending socket samples are generating such code by llvm.
I was planning to add an explicit test to test_bpf, but feel free
to beat me to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/