[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547F3A9F.30701@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:30:23 +0800
From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: airlied@...ux.ie, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
heiko@...ech.de, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com, djkurtz@...gle.com, ykk@...k-chips.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, mark.yao@...k-chips.com,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 03/12] drm: imx: imx-hdmi: convert imx-hdmi to drm_bridge
mode
On 2014年12月04日 00:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:04:37AM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
>> Hi Russell:
>>
>> On 2014年12月03日 23:38, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:29:26PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
>>>> +int imx_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>>>> + void *data, struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>>>> + const struct imx_hdmi_plat_data *plat_data)
>>>> {
>>>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>>> - const struct of_device_id *of_id =
>>>> - of_match_device(imx_hdmi_dt_ids, dev);
>>>> struct drm_device *drm = data;
>>>> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>>> struct device_node *ddc_node;
>>>> @@ -1594,19 +1566,16 @@ static int imx_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>>> struct resource *iores;
>>>> int ret, irq;
>>>> - hdmi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + hdmi = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (!hdmi)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>> - hdmi->dev = dev;
>>>> + hdmi->plat_data = plat_data;
>>>> + hdmi->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> + hdmi->dev_type = plat_data->dev_type;
>>>> hdmi->sample_rate = 48000;
>>>> hdmi->ratio = 100;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (of_id) {
>>>> - const struct platform_device_id *device_id = of_id->data;
>>>> -
>>>> - hdmi->dev_type = device_id->driver_data;
>>>> - }
>>>> + hdmi->encoder = encoder;
>>> I'd suggest changing imx_hdmi_bind() to take the struct resource and irq
>>> number, and avoiding the platform device stuff altogether in here.
>>>
>> Actually this is what the current code do: the resource and irq number
>> are all handled in imx_hdmi_bind
> I meant that imx_hdmi_bind should be passed these, so that it needs to
> know nothing about the struct device beyond the generic device structure.
> In other words, the dw-hdmi core should not assume that the struct device
> is part of a platform device.
>
if so, how about the device tree properties ddc-i2c-bus,
reg-io-width, iahb, isfr,
they are all found by device?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists