[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hiohsr6hz.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:24:40 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@...6.fr>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: pci: cmipci.c: Cleaning up function that are not used anywhere
At Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:17:39 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>
> 2014-12-03 7:55 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>:
> > At Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:12:55 +0100,
> > Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> >>
> >> Remove function snd_cmipci_pll_rmn() that is not used anywhere.
> >
> > It's an experimental code that is currently disabled. Keeping such a
> > code would be still meaningful if anyone wants to start a similar
> > experiment again.
> >
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> >> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
> >> ---
> >> sound/pci/cmipci.c | 41 -----------------------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 41 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/sound/pci/cmipci.c b/sound/pci/cmipci.c
> >> index 85ed403..e33edae 100644
> >> --- a/sound/pci/cmipci.c
> >> +++ b/sound/pci/cmipci.c
> >> @@ -615,47 +615,6 @@ static unsigned int snd_cmipci_rate_freq(unsigned int rate)
> >>
> >> #ifdef USE_VAR48KRATE
> >> /*
> >> - * Determine PLL values for frequency setup, maybe the CMI8338 (CMI8738???)
> >> - * does it this way .. maybe not. Never get any information from C-Media about
> >> - * that <werner@...e.de>.
> >> - */
> >> -static int snd_cmipci_pll_rmn(unsigned int rate, unsigned int adcmult, int *r, int *m, int *n)
> >> -{
> >> - unsigned int delta, tolerance;
> >> - int xm, xn, xr;
> >> -
> >> - for (*r = 0; rate < CM_MAXIMUM_RATE/adcmult; *r += (1<<5))
> >> - rate <<= 1;
> >> - *n = -1;
> >> - if (*r > 0xff)
> >> - goto out;
> >> - tolerance = rate*CM_TOLERANCE_RATE;
> >> -
> >> - for (xn = (1+2); xn < (0x1f+2); xn++) {
> >> - for (xm = (1+2); xm < (0xff+2); xm++) {
> >> - xr = ((CM_REFFREQ_XIN/adcmult) * xm) / xn;
> >> -
> >> - if (xr < rate)
> >> - delta = rate - xr;
> >> - else
> >> - delta = xr - rate;
> >> -
> >> - /*
> >> - * If we found one, remember this,
> >> - * and try to find a closer one
> >> - */
> >> - if (delta < tolerance) {
> >> - tolerance = delta;
> >> - *m = xm - 2;
> >> - *n = xn - 2;
> >> - }
> >> - }
> >> - }
> >> -out:
> >> - return (*n > -1);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -/*
> >> * Program pll register bits, I assume that the 8 registers 0xf8 up to 0xff
> >> * are mapped onto the 8 ADC/DAC sampling frequency which can be chosen
> >> * at the register CM_REG_FUNCTRL1 (0x04).
> >> --
> >> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> Hi
>
> Maybe it had been appropriate to add some comment or something then....?
It's inside the ifdef block that is already disabled... Obviously for
experiments.
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists