[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203180451.GR7915@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:04:52 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: arm64: lift restriction on last instruction
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:54:32PM +0000, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com> wrote:
> > Earlier implementation assumed last instruction is BPF_EXIT.
> > Since this is no longer a restriction in eBPF, we remove this
> > limitation.
> >
> > Per Alexei Starovoitov [1]:
> >> classic BPF has a restriction that last insn is always BPF_RET.
> >> eBPF doesn't have BPF_RET instruction and this restriction.
> >> It has BPF_EXIT insn which can appear anywhere in the program
> >> one or more times and it doesn't have to be last insn.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/27/2
> >
> > Fixes: e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
> > Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
>
> yours is cleaner than my own attempt to fix it.
> Thanks!
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cheers, I've applied this for 3.19.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists