[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxa90b31Fvy6RkvMneY3+GTR=Nko2Sgj2mk7SSHZC7b6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:48:55 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I don't know. This piece of code:
>
> delta = clocksource_delta(wdnow, cs->wd_last, watchdog->mask);
>
> makes no sense to me.
Yeah, no, I see what's up. I missed that whole wd_last vs cs_last
pairing. I guess that part is all good. There are other crazy issues
in there, though, like the double test of 'watchdog_reset_pending'. So
I still wonder, though, since that odd 96-second delta is just insane
and makes no sense from a TSC standpoint (it's closer to a 32-bit
overflow of a hpet counter, but that sounds off too).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists