[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hvblsy0a6.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:57:05 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc\@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Tobias Jakobi <Liquid.Acid@....net>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] ARM: Exynos: add support for sub-power domains
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-12-03 13:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Marek Szyprowski
>> <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
>>> index abde1ea8a119..b884358ebb1a 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
>>> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Optional Properties:
>>> - pclkN, clkN: Pairs of parent of input clock and input clock to the
>>> devices in this power domain. Maximum of 4 pairs (N = 0 to 3)
>>> are supported currently.
>>> +- samsung,power-domain: phandle to a master power domain that the given domain
>>> + is a part of
>> For new DTSes I'd recommend using the generic "power-domains" only.
>
> I think that some consistency in dts style will be really an added
> value. In my opinion for
> all existing DTSes we should keep using 'samsung,power-domain' (even
> for defining a parent
> power domains) and for all new DTSes, the generic 'power-domains'
> binding should be used.
Or even better, convert the existing DTSs to use generic power-domain
first, and then use generic ones going forward also.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists