[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2041200.ZjakFFAZAU@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 21:13:18 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rajeev Kumar <rajeevkumar.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: dwc: Add devicetree support for Designware I2S
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 16:39:08 Andrew Jackson wrote:
> Convert to driver to use either platform_data or device-tree for configuration
> of the device. When using device-tree, the I2S block's configuration is read
> from the relevant registers: this reduces the amount of information required in
> the device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>
I don't think we even have to worry about the platform_data case here:
the only platform using this hardware in Linux is arm/mach-spear, and
it defines a device node with a binding that is similar to the one you
document here but that is not implemented in the driver.
So, I think for all practical purposes we can assume that nobody cares
if you make incompatible changes as long as you don't introduce build
regression.
Also, please adapt the arch/arm/boot/dts/spear13*.dts{,i} files
as good as you can. They are broken in other ways too that you don't
have to fix, just make them conform to the binding you add.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists