[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203155208.GC3081@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:52:08 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux@...elenboom.it
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/pciback: Restore configuration
space when detaching from a guest.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:11:50PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 05:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >The commit "xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding." was using
> >the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
> >That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
> >the lock-less version and requiring that the callers
> >of 'pcistub_put_pci_dev' take the device lock. And as such
> >this bug got exposed.
> >
> >Using the lock-less version is OK, except that we tried to
> >use 'pci_restore_state' after the lock-less version of
> >__pci_reset_function_locked - which won't work as 'state_saved'
> >is set to false. Said 'state_saved' is a toggle boolean that
> >is to be used by the sequence of a) pci_save_state/pci_restore_state
> >or b) pci_load_and_free_saved_state/pci_restore_state. We don't
> >want to use a) as the guest might have messed up the PCI
> >configuration space and we want it to revert to the state
> >when the PCI device was binded to us. Therefore we pick
> >b) to restore the configuration space.
>
>
> Doesn't this all mean that patch 1/7 broke pcistub_put_pci_dev()?
It fixed it (there was a deadlock there).
But the fix to the dead-lock exposed this bug.
One could say that 1/7 broke it because it never worked in the
first place, but now that it works (thanks to #1) - it did not
work right?
Squashing the patches together is a bit too much I fear.
>
> -boris
>
>
> >
> >We restore from our 'golden' version of PCI configuration space, when an:
> > - Device is unbinded from pciback
> > - Device is detached from a guest.
> >
> >Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
> >Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> >---
> > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >index 843a2ba..eb8b58e 100644
> >--- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void pcistub_device_release(struct kref *kref)
> > */
> > __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> > if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(dev, &dev_data->pci_saved_state))
> >- dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> >+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> > else
> > pci_restore_state(dev);
> >@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > struct pcistub_device *psdev, *found_psdev = NULL;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >+ struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
> >+ int ret;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&pcistub_devices_lock, flags);
> >@@ -279,9 +281,19 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > * (so it's ready for the next domain)
> > */
> > device_lock_assert(&dev->dev);
> >- __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> >- pci_restore_state(dev);
> >-
> >+ dev_data = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
> >+ ret = pci_load_saved_state(dev, dev_data->pci_saved_state);
> >+ if (ret < 0)
> >+ dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> >+ else {
> >+ __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> >+ /*
> >+ * The usual sequence is pci_save_state & pci_restore_state
> >+ * but the guest might have messed the configuration space up.
> >+ * Use the initial version (when device was bound to us).
> >+ */
> >+ pci_restore_state(dev);
> >+ }
> > /* This disables the device. */
> > xen_pcibk_reset_device(dev);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists