[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141204001116.GB25340@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:11:16 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mips/gup: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:30:17PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
>
> Change the gup code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/gup.c b/arch/mips/mm/gup.c
> index 06ce17c..8aa50e3 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/mm/gup.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ retry:
>
> return pte;
> #else
> - return ACCESS_ONCE(*ptep);
> + return READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> #endif
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists