linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] s390/kvm: REPLACE ACCESS_ONCE with READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141204001243.GE25340@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:12:43 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] s390/kvm: REPLACE ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:30:20PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
> 
> Change the ipte lock code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> index 0f961a1..8f195fa 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> @@ -229,10 +229,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		goto out;
>  	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
>  	do {
> -		old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
> +		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
>  		while (old.k) {
>  			cond_resched();
> -			old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
> +			old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
>  		}
>  		new = old;
>  		new.k = 1;
> @@ -251,7 +251,8 @@ static void ipte_unlock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		goto out;
>  	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
>  	do {
> -		new = old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
> +		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
> +		new = old;
>  		new.k = 0;
>  	} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
>  	wake_up(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_wq);
> @@ -265,10 +266,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 
>  	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
>  	do {
> -		old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
> +		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
>  		while (old.kg) {
>  			cond_resched();
> -			old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
> +			old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
>  		}
>  		new = old;
>  		new.k = 1;
> @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 
>  	ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
>  	do {
> -		new = old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
> +		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
> +		new = old;
>  		new.kh--;
>  		if (!new.kh)
>  			new.k = 0;
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/