[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141204075213.GQ25806@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:52:14 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: marzen-reference: Remove IRLM
workaround
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:33:25PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > Hi Magnus,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:18:13PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>
> >>
> >> Adjust the r8a7779 SoC DTS and the Marzen Reference
> >> C board code to use DTS only for INTC-IRQPIN IRLM setup.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Written on top of renesas-devel-20141202-v3.18-rc7 and
> >> [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779 CCF DTS update
> >>
> >> Has a runtime dependency on:
> >> [PATCH 01/02] irqchip: renesas-intc-irqpin: r8a7779 IRLM setup support
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi | 5 +++--
> >> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen-reference.c | 7 -------
> >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --- 0002/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
> >> +++ work/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi 2014-12-03 20:27:49.000000000 +0900
> >> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
> >> interrupt-controller;
> >> };
> >>
> >> - irqpin0: irqpin@...80010 {
> >> + irqpin0: irqpin@...80000 {
> >> compatible = "renesas,intc-irqpin-r8a7779", "renesas,intc-irqpin";
> >> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> >> status = "disabled";
> >> @@ -148,7 +148,8 @@
> >> <0xfe780010 4>,
> >> <0xfe780024 4>,
> >> <0xfe780044 4>,
> >> - <0xfe780064 4>;
> >> + <0xfe780064 4>,
> >> + <0xfe780000 4>;
> >
> > Is there any order implied by the above list?
> > Naïvely I would expect it to be sorted numerically.
>
> Yes, the driver assumes the register banks to be passed in a certain
> order. In the case of r8a7779 we add one more register bank at the end
> for IRLM setup. Register detail (base address, access size, order and
> bitfield width) varies with SoC version. So the IRLM register will be
> at different addresses depending on SoC, but the driver wants it at
> the end of the list.
Thanks, if it is intentional then that is fine by me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists