[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5480144F.2040506@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:59:11 +0200
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>, wsa@...-dreams.de
CC: jdelvare@...e.de, arnd@...db.de, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
dianders@...omium.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, andrew@...n.ch,
sjg@...omium.org, markus.mayer@...aro.org,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, max.schwarz@...ine.de,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, skuribay@...ox.com,
Romain.Baeriswyl@...lis.com, wenkai.du@...el.com,
chiau.ee.chew@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] i2c-designware: Add i2c bus locking support
Hi
On 12/02/2014 02:09 AM, David E. Box wrote:
> Adds support for acquiring and releasing a hardware bus lock in the i2c
> designware core transfer function. This is needed for i2c bus controllers
> that are shared with but not controlled by the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 6 ++++++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index a743115..afdff3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -261,10 +261,16 @@ static int dw_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return r;
> }
>
> - pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 1000);
> - pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> - pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
> - pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + i2c_dw_eval_lock_support(dev);
i2c_dw_eval_lock_support() is added in the next patch.
> +
> + if (dev->pm_runtime_disabled) {
> + pm_runtime_forbid(&pdev->dev);
> + } else {
> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 1000);
> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -314,7 +320,9 @@ static int dw_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct dw_i2c_dev *i_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> clk_prepare_enable(i_dev->clk);
> - i2c_dw_init(i_dev);
> +
> + if (!i_dev->pm_runtime_disabled)
> + i2c_dw_init(i_dev);
>
Should there be similar conditional call or locking around i2c_dw_init()
and i2c_dw_disable_int() also in dw_i2c_probe()?
--
Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists