[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417685187.2721.1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:26:27 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: bpf_jit_comp: simplify trivial boolean return
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 10:49 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 12:25 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > Why the change in data?
>
> btw: without gcov and using -O2
>
> $ size arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o*
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 9671 4 0 9675 25cb arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o.new
> 10679 4 0 10683 29bb arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o.old
Alexei?
Is this 10% reduction in size a good reason to change the code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists