linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: Add full ISA emulator.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141204101229.GC5482@NP-P-BURTON>
Date:	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:16:22 +0000
From:	Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
To:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>
CC:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	<ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>,
	<geert+renesas@...der.be>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	<chenhc@...ote.com>, <cl@...ux.com>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
	<richard@....at>, <zajec5@...il.com>, <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	<keescook@...omium.org>, <tj@...nel.org>, <alex@...x-smith.me.uk>,
	<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
	<qais.yousef@...tec.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<markos.chandras@...tec.com>, <dengcheng.zhu@...tec.com>,
	<manuel.lauss@...il.com>, <lars.persson@...s.com>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: Add full ISA emulator.

Nice work David, I like this approach. It's so much simpler than hacking
atop the current dsemul code. I also imagine this could be reused for
emulation of instructions removed in r6, when running pre-r6 userland
binaries on r6 systems.

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 06:21:36PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> On 12/03/2014 05:56 PM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> >I see only two technical issues here which differs:
> >
> >1.  You believe your GCC experts, I trust HW Architecture manual and
> >don't trust toolchain people too much ==> we see a different value in
> >fact that your approach has a subset of emulated ISAs (and it can't, of
> >course, emulate anything because some custom opcodes are reused).
> 
> Yes, I agree that the emulation approach cannot handle some of the cases you
> mention (most would have to be the result of hand coded assembly
> specifically trying to break it).

I'm not sure I'd agree even with that - ASEs & vendor-specific
instructions could easily be added if necessary.

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 05:56:51PM -0800, Leonid Yehoshin wrote:
> >2.  My approach is ready to use and is used right now, you still have a
> >framework which passed an initial boot.

Subjective.

Thanks,
    Paul

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)