[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDWd=hC4e25bmGW-C8HRuQzxx=e+1rqLZbmUqmcgbCBaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:10:01 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
Cc: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Jun" <jun.zhang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Liu, Changcheng" <changcheng.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: fix select_task_rq_fair return -1
On 4 December 2014 at 12:10, Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com> wrote:
>>
>> The change below will give a similar behavior than 3.18 for 3.14 and
>> we still match the condition if (new_cpu == -1 || new_cpu == cpu) in
>>
> And -1 is no longer needed.
yes indeed
>
>> order to go in the child level
>>
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -4151,7 +4151,7 @@ static int
>> find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
>> {
>> unsigned long load, min_load = ULONG_MAX;
>> - int idlest = -1;
>> + int idlest = this_cpu;
>> int i;
>>
>> /* Traverse only the allowed CPUs */
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists