[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141204163032.GA29076@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 08:30:32 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: suppress build warning
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:13:00PM +0000, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 December 2014 14:38:30 Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >> this patch fixes following build warning:
> >>
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c: In function ‘ioc4_probe’:
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:194:16: warning: ‘start’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >> period = (end - start) /
> >> ^
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:148:11: note: ‘start’ was declared here
> >> uint64_t start, end, period;
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
> >
> > Please explain why the compiler thinks there is a bug, why you
> > are sure that there isn't, and why you picked '0' as the
> > initialization value.
> >
> Its a false positive, to suppress the warning '0' was picked.
Are you _sure_ it's a false positive? That odd do/while loop looks like
it might just not ever initialize the start variable, are you sure the
logic there is correct?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists