[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417711030.5386.35.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:37:10 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] arch_fast_hash: avoid indirect function calls
and implement hash in asm
On Do, 2014-12-04 at 23:56 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:08:50PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > By default the arch_fast_hash hashing function pointers are initialized
> > to jhash(2). If during boot-up a CPU with SSE4.2 is detected they get
> > updated to the CRC32 ones. This dispatching scheme incurs a function
> > pointer lookup and indirect call for every hashing operation.
>
> Just curious, is jhash actually faster than generic C CRC32 on
> common platforms?
Yes, jhash always beats crc32 in software on x86_64 and ia32.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists