linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] virtio_ccw: legacy: don't negotiate rev 1/features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141204180912.GA24274@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:09:12 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	linux390@...ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] virtio_ccw: legacy: don't negotiate rev
 1/features

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 06:56:06PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:26:45 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Legacy balloon device doesn't pretend to support revision 1 or 64 bit
> > features.
> > 
> > But just in case someone implements a broken one that does, let's not
> > even try to drive legacy only devices using revision 1, and let's not
> > give them a chance to say they support VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 by not reading
> > high feature bits.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> > index 4a3e6e5..088bdf1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> > @@ -733,6 +733,9 @@ static u64 virtio_ccw_get_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > 
> >  	rc = le32_to_cpu(features->features);
> > 
> > +	if (vcdev->revision == 0)
> > +		goto out_free;
> > +
> >  	/* Read second half of the feature bits from the host. */
> >  	features->index = 1;
> >  	ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_READ_FEAT;
> > @@ -1182,9 +1185,13 @@ static int virtio_ccw_online(struct ccw_device *cdev)
> >  	vcdev->vdev.id.vendor = cdev->id.cu_type;
> >  	vcdev->vdev.id.device = cdev->id.cu_model;
> > 
> > -	ret = virtio_ccw_set_transport_rev(vcdev);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		goto out_free;
> > +	if (virtio_device_is_legacy_only(vcdev->vdev.id)) {
> 
> Inverted logic?

Ugh, clearly.

> > +		ret = virtio_ccw_set_transport_rev(vcdev);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out_free;
> > +	} else {
> > +		vcdev->revision = 0;
> > +	}
> > 
> >  	ret = register_virtio_device(&vcdev->vdev);
> >  	if (ret) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/