[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141204211912.GG4080@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:19:12 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Leonard Crestez <lcrestez@...acom.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sorin Dumitru <sdumitru@...acom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] percpu: Add a separate function to merge free areas
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:15:27PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > ... except that somebody has not known that and took refcounts on e.g.
> > vfsmounts into percpu. With massive amounts of hilarity once docker folks
> > started to test the workloads that created/destroyed those in large amounts.
>
> Well, vfsmounts being a performance issue is a bit weird and unexpected.
Docker usage is pretty wide-spread now, making what used to be
siberia-cold paths hot enough to cause actual scalability issues.
Besides, we're now using percpu_ref for things like aio and cgroup
control structures which can be created and destroyed quite
frequently. I don't think we can say these are "weird" use cases
anymore.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists