[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5480DFB5.4090708@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:27:01 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn()
in mppe_rekey()
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_mppe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_mppe.c
> []
>> @@ -172,9 +172,8 @@ static void mppe_rekey(struct ppp_mppe_state * state, int initial_key)
>> setup_sg(sg_in, state->sha1_digest, state->keylen);
>> setup_sg(sg_out, state->session_key, state->keylen);
>> if (crypto_blkcipher_encrypt(&desc, sg_out, sg_in,
>> - state->keylen) != 0) {
>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "mppe_rekey: cipher_encrypt failed\n");
>> - }
>> + state->keylen) != 0)
>> + pr_warn("mppe_rekey: cipher_encrypt failed\n");
>
> It's generally nicer to replace embedded function names
> with "%s: ", __func__
>
> pr_warn("%s: cipher_encrypt failed\n", __func__);
Do you want that I send a third patch series for the fine-tuning of these parameters?
Regards,
Martkus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists