[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1417778289-51567-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:18:04 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, mst@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM, peterz@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com,
hocko@...e.cz
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/5] Reenable might_sleep() checks for might_fault()
I recently discovered that might_fault() doesn't call might_sleep() anymore.
Therefore bugs like:
spin_lock(&lock);
rc = copy_to_user(...);
spin_unlock(&lock);
would not be detected with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP. The code was changed to
disable false positives for code like:
pagefault_disable();
rc = copy_to_user(...);
pagefault_enable();
Until now, pagefault_disable() and pagefault_enable() simply modified the
preempt count, therefore telling the pagefault handler that the context is
atomic and sleeping is disallowed.
In order to reenable might_sleep() checks for the correct path, we need a way to
detect whether we run in a pagefault_disable() context.
This series therefore introduces a separate pagefault_count and uses it to count
the levels of pagefault_disable() per thread. might_sleep() checks are
reactivated for the !pagefault_disable() path.
So this should now work:
spin_lock(&lock); /* also if left away */
pagefault_disable()
rc = copy_to_user(...);
pagefault_enable();
spin_unlock(&lock);
And this should report a warning again:
spin_lock(&lock);
rc = copy_to_user(...);
spin_unlock(&lock);
Please note that this series will not completely split the handling of
pagefault_disable() and the preempt count. This will be done in another series.
Purpose of this series is to reenable might_sleep() checks for might_fault(),
avoiding to produce false positives.
Cross compiled on powerpc, arm, sparc, sparc64, arm64, x86_64, i386, mips,
alpha, ia64, xtensa, m68k, microblaze.
Tested on s390. Would be good to get some feedback on the ASM offsets for m32r,
sparc and xtensa (or if I should simply move the count to the end of the struct
for these archs ...).
Thanks!
David
David Hildenbrand (5):
uaccess: add pagefault_count to thread_info
uaccess: count pagefault_disable() levels in pagefault_count
mm, uaccess: trigger might_sleep() in might_fault() when pagefaults
are disabled
uaccess: clearify that uaccess may only sleep if pagefaults are not
disabled
uaccess: CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEFAULT_COUNT to debug pagefault_count
arch/alpha/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/arc/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/avr32/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/avr32/include/asm/uaccess.h | 12 +++++---
arch/blackfin/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/c6x/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/cris/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/frv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/hexagon/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h | 3 +-
arch/ia64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/m32r/include/asm/thread_info.h | 5 +--
arch/m32r/include/asm/uaccess.h | 30 ++++++++++++------
arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/metag/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/microblaze/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 ++--
arch/mips/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++---------
arch/mn10300/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/openrisc/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/parisc/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h | 15 ++++++---
arch/score/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/score/include/asm/uaccess.h | 15 ++++++---
arch/sh/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h | 20 ++++++------
arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h | 17 ++++++-----
arch/tile/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/tile/include/asm/uaccess.h | 21 ++++++++-----
arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/unicore32/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 15 ++++++---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h | 6 ++--
arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c | 6 ++--
arch/xtensa/include/asm/thread_info.h | 5 +--
include/linux/kernel.h | 3 +-
include/linux/uaccess.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 ++++++
lib/strnlen_user.c | 6 ++--
mm/maccess.c | 11 +++++++
mm/memory.c | 19 +++++-------
47 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
--
1.8.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists