| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8ui4Ur3Z7CwWXHf-xg101U=OJcMhOUxbqp4dWkcdF6U8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:54:35 +0000
From: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: platform: add VPFE capture driver support for AM437X
Hi Hans,
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Sorry, there are still a few items that need to be fixed.
> If you can make a v4 with these issues addressed, then I can still make a
> pull request, although it depends on Mauro whether it is still accepted for
> 3.19.
>
OK will post a v4 tonight fixing all the below issues.
FYI: Looking at the response of Mauro on 'soc-camera: 1st set for 3.19'
he wont accept it!
Thanks,
--Prabhakar Lad
> On 12/04/2014 12:12 AM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>> From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
>>
>> This patch adds Video Processing Front End (VPFE) driver for
>> AM437X family of devices
>> Driver supports the following:
>> - V4L2 API using MMAP buffer access based on videobuf2 api
>> - Asynchronous sensor/decoder sub device registration
>> - DT support
>
> Just to confirm: this driver only supports SDTV formats? No HDTV?
> I didn't see any VIDIOC_*_DV_TIMINGS support, so I assume it really
> isn't supported.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>> ---
>
> <snip>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..25863e8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c
>
> <snip>
>
>> +
>> +static int
>> +cmp_v4l2_format(const struct v4l2_format *lhs, const struct v4l2_format *rhs)
>> +{
>> + return lhs->type == rhs->type &&
>> + lhs->fmt.pix.width == rhs->fmt.pix.width &&
>> + lhs->fmt.pix.height == rhs->fmt.pix.height &&
>> + lhs->fmt.pix.pixelformat == rhs->fmt.pix.pixelformat &&
>> + lhs->fmt.pix.field == rhs->fmt.pix.field &&
>> + lhs->fmt.pix.colorspace == rhs->fmt.pix.colorspace;
>
> Add a check for pix.ycbcr_enc and pix.quantization.
>
OK
> <snip>
>
>> +/*
>> + * vpfe_release : This function is based on the vb2_fop_release
>> + * helper function.
>> + * It has been augmented to handle module power management,
>> + * by disabling/enabling h/w module fcntl clock when necessary.
>> + */
>> +static int vpfe_release(struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + struct vpfe_device *vpfe = video_drvdata(file);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + vpfe_dbg(2, vpfe, "vpfe_release\n");
>> +
>> + ret = _vb2_fop_release(file, NULL);
>
> This isn't going to work. _vb2_fop_release calls v4l2_fh_release(), so
> the v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file) will be wrong and you release the fh
> once too many.
>
> I would do this:
>
> if (!v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file))
> return vb2_fop_release(file);
> mutex_lock(&vpfe->lock);
> ret = _vb2_fop_release(file, NULL);
> vpfe_ccdc_close(&vpfe->ccdc, vpfe->pdev);
> mutex_unlock(&vpfe->lock);
> return ret;
>
>> +
>> + if (v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file)) {
>> + mutex_lock(&vpfe->lock);
>> + vpfe_ccdc_close(&vpfe->ccdc, vpfe->pdev);
>> + v4l2_fh_release(file);
>> + mutex_unlock(&vpfe->lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> <snip>
>
>> +static int vpfe_enum_size(struct file *file, void *priv,
>> + struct v4l2_frmsizeenum *fsize)
>> +{
>> + struct vpfe_device *vpfe = video_drvdata(file);
>> + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_size_enum fse;
>> + struct vpfe_subdev_info *sdinfo;
>> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt mbus;
>> + struct v4l2_pix_format pix;
>> + struct vpfe_fmt *fmt;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + vpfe_dbg(2, vpfe, "vpfe_enum_size\n");
>> +
>> + /* check for valid format */
>> + fmt = find_format_by_pix(fsize->pixel_format);
>> + if (!fmt) {
>> + vpfe_dbg(3, vpfe, "Invalid pixel code: %x, default used instead\n",
>> + fsize->pixel_format);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + memset(fsize->reserved, 0x0, sizeof(fsize->reserved));
>> +
>> + sdinfo = vpfe->current_subdev;
>> + if (!sdinfo->sd)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + memset(&pix, 0x0, sizeof(pix));
>> + /* Construct pix from parameter and use default for the rest */
>> + pix.pixelformat = fsize->pixel_format;
>> + pix.width = 640;
>> + pix.height = 480;
>> + pix.colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB;
>> + pix.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
>> + pix_to_mbus(vpfe, &pix, &mbus);
>> +
>> + memset(&fse, 0x0, sizeof(fse));
>> + fse.index = fsize->index;
>> + fse.pad = 0;
>> + fse.code = mbus.code;
>> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sdinfo->sd, pad, enum_frame_size, NULL, &fse);
>
> FYI: strictly speaking this is wrong since this op theoretically expects a
> v4l2_subdev_fh pointer instead of a NULL argument. However, you do not have
> an alternative right now. As you know, I've been working on fixing this, so
> if that gets accepted, then you need to update this code as well in a later
> patch.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + vpfe_dbg(1, vpfe, "vpfe_enum_size: index: %d code: %x W:[%d,%d] H:[%d,%d]\n",
>> + fse.index, fse.code, fse.min_width, fse.max_width,
>> + fse.min_height, fse.max_height);
>> +
>> + fsize->type = V4L2_FRMSIZE_TYPE_DISCRETE;
>> + fsize->discrete.width = fse.max_width;
>> + fsize->discrete.height = fse.max_height;
>> +
>> + vpfe_dbg(1, vpfe, "vpfe_enum_size: index: %d pixformat: %s size: %dx%d\n",
>> + fsize->index, print_fourcc(fsize->pixel_format),
>> + fsize->discrete.width, fsize->discrete.height);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> <snip>
>
>> +static int
>> +vpfe_g_selection(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_selection *s)
>> +{
>> + struct vpfe_device *vpfe = video_drvdata(file);
>> +
>> + switch (s->target) {
>> + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_COMPOSE_DEFAULT:
>> + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_COMPOSE_BOUNDS:
>
> These two COMPOSE cases should be dropped, since there is no compose support!
>
>> + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_BOUNDS:
>> + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP_DEFAULT:
>> + s->r.left = s->r.top = 0;
>> + s->r.width = vpfe->crop.width;
>> + s->r.height = vpfe->crop.height;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP:
>> + s->r = vpfe->crop;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> <snip>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists