[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141205135418.GL20350@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:54:18 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Jike Song <jike.song@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"White, Michael L" <michael.l.white@...el.com>,
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@...el.com>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Li, Susie" <susie.li@...el.com>,
"Cowperthwaite, David J" <david.j.cowperthwaite@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Haron, Sandra" <sandra.haron@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE][RFC] KVMGT - the implementation of Intel
GVT-g(full GPU virtualization) for KVM
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:50:21AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc14/technical-sessions/presentation/tian
>
> /me goes read this.
>
> A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
> compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
>
> * Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
> module. Everything (vgt, i915, kvm) must be compiled into the
> kernel.
> * Design approach still seems to be i915 on vgt not the other way
> around.
Yeah done a quick read-through of just the i915 bits too, same comment. I
guess this is just the first RFC and the redesign we've discussed about
already with xengt is in progress somewhere?
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists