lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417788483-662-5-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:08:03 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] x86/xen: assume a 64-bit DMA mask is required

On a Xen PV guest the DMA addresses and physical addresses are not 1:1
(such as Xen PV guests) and the generic dma_get_required_mask() does
not return the correct mask (since it uses max_pfn).

Some device drivers (such as mptsas, mpt2sas) use
dma_get_required_mask() to set the device's DMA mask to allow them to
use only 32-bit DMA addresses in hardware structures.  This results in
unnecessary use of the SWIOTLB if DMA addresses are more than 32-bits,
impacting performance significantly.

We could base the DMA mask on the maximum MFN but:

a) The hypercall op to get the maximum MFN (XENMEM_maximum_ram_page)
will truncate the result to an int in 32-bit guests.

b) Future uses of the IOMMU in Xen may map frames at bus addresses
above the end of RAM.

So, just assume a 64-bit DMA mask is always required.

Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
---
 arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c b/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c
index 0e98e5d..35774f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
 
 int xen_swiotlb __read_mostly;
 
+static u64 xen_swiotlb_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
+}
+
 static struct dma_map_ops xen_swiotlb_dma_ops = {
 	.mapping_error = xen_swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
 	.alloc = xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
@@ -31,6 +36,7 @@ static struct dma_map_ops xen_swiotlb_dma_ops = {
 	.map_page = xen_swiotlb_map_page,
 	.unmap_page = xen_swiotlb_unmap_page,
 	.dma_supported = xen_swiotlb_dma_supported,
+	.get_required_mask = xen_swiotlb_get_required_mask,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ