[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141205195013.GA16916@treble.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:50:13 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kpatch@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/3] kernel: add support for live patching
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 06:55:04PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 12/04/2014, 04:53 PM, Seth Jennings wrote:
> ...
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,902 @@
> ...
> > +static struct kobj_type klp_ktype_patch = {
> > + .sysfs_ops = &kobj_sysfs_ops,
> > + .default_attrs = klp_patch_attrs
> > +};
>
> Hi, I seem to have only a single comment here. If I am looking
> correctly, the last put on this kobject will cause kobject_cleanup to
> generate a warning:
> "kobject: '%s' (%p): does not have a release() "
> "function, it is broken and must be fixed.\n",
>
> There should be some .release. IMO, this is a place where we will
> release the module with the patch. So the .release hook should contain
> something like a commented out module_put() with a pointer to
> klp_register_patch. (Or be empty at worst.)
Ok, thanks.
BTW, Seth will be out for at least the next week. I'll take over the
patch set until he returns.
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists