lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <345838865.5722597.1417810607255.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10603.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:16:47 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Denis Du <dudenis2000@...oo.ca>
To:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: TTY layer need a lock to copy data to user space



Hi, Guys:
It was found that the 3.12 kernel tty layer will lose or corrupt data when have a full-duplex communication, especcially in high baudrate, for example 230k for my OMAP5 uart. Eventually I found there is lock missing between copy data to ldisc layer buffer and copy data from the same buffer to user 
space. I believe this issue existed since 3.8 kernel(since this kernel , it start to remove most of the spin-locks) and I didn't find any fix even through 3.17 kernel. This patch was tested to be works great with no any data loss again.


I did try to use the existed lock atomic_read_lock, but it doesn’t work. 



Denis Du
View attachment "Fix-serial-lose-data-by-newlock.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1999 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ