lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141205212958.GA3012@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:29:58 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/4] dma, x86, xen: reduce SWIOTLB usage in Xen guests

On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 02:07:59PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On systems where DMA addresses and physical addresses are not 1:1
> (such as Xen PV guests), the generic dma_get_required_mask() will not
> return the correct mask (since it uses max_pfn).
> 
> Some device drivers (such as mptsas, mpt2sas) use
> dma_get_required_mask() to set the device's DMA mask to allow them to use
> only 32-bit DMA addresses in hardware structures.  This results in
> unnecessary use of the SWIOTLB if DMA addresses are more than 32-bits,
> impacting performance significantly.
> 
> This series allows Xen PV guests to override the default
> dma_get_required_mask() with a more suitable one.
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - xen_swiotlb_get_required_mask() is x86 only.
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - Assume 64-bit mask is required.
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - fix off-by-one in xen_dma_get_required_mask()
> - split ia64 changes into separate patch.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - split x86 and xen changes into separate patches
> 
> David

Why are you sending these to me?  Am I the DMA maintainer and forgot
about it?

/me digs in MAINTAINERS...

Nope, not me!  Patches are now deleted from my queue, go use
scripts/get_maintainer.pl like you should have done...

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ