[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141206115412.GA6618@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 13:54:12 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>
Cc: Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
josh.triplett@...el.com, christophe.ricard@...il.com,
jason.gunthorpe@...idianresearch.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
trousers-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v9 6/8] tpm: TPM 2.0 baseline support
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 03:35:49PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
>
> >is it cool if I prepare a separate set of fixes for all issues
> >in v9? I do not see any problem that could not be fixed without
> >major structural changes.
>
>
>
> to be honest - I would prefer a v10 with the fixes included,
> especially since there were quite a few issues/remarks.
> If you already have fixes post them as patches on top of v9 so we
> can test, and then squash them in.
It's as easy for me to just prepare a new patch set.
> I think we are still in schedule if you do fixes over the weekend
> - so we hopefully have a _great_ v10 on monday/tuesday
Yeah, I apologize for the state of v9. I admit that I rushed with it
a bit. I'll prepare a new patch set over the weekend.
> I'll send out the first pull request without TPM2.0 support later
> this evening,
> and then send out another one by next week - this should be fine.
Great!
> The next testing slot is Sunday evening since I'm travelling
> myself (and don't have TPM hardware with me).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists