lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54832761.1050700@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 06 Dec 2014 23:57:21 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
To:	"jejb@...isc-linux.org" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joel Brobecker <brobecker@...core.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: uapi: asm: mman.h: Let MADV_FREE have same value
 for all architectures

Hello Maintainers:

After this patch, our parisc can pass allmodconfig in linux next tree,
for me, we can say parisc specific code have no touch for allmodconfig.
:-)

But for parisc gcc latest upstream compiler, I found several issues, and
I shall try to analyse them and communicate with gcc related members.

And I also want to consult about parisc assembly instructions, I can not
find the related reference documents, could you help to have a check (or
provide some related information for it)? related contents are below:

  parisc support several store instructions: 'stb' (for store byte),
  'stw(m)' (for store word), and 'std' (for store double word).

  They should be in the same format in binary code, and have neighbour
  numbers, and 'stw(m)' need be in the middle of 'stb' and 'std'. one
  sample for the instruction 'inst' (it is 'unsigned int'):

   - for ((inst >> 26) != 0x3):

     stb: 0x18, or 0x19,
     stw: 0x1a, stwm: 0x1b,
     std: 0x1c.

   - else ((inst >> 26) == 0x3), need check '(inst >> 6) & 0xf':

     stb: 0x08, or 0x09,
     stw: 0x0a,
     std: 0x0b.

  it is about my binutils/gdb patch for parisc, gdb want to recognize
  'st??' to find the position for saving relate context (registers).


Welcome any suggestions, ideas, and completions.

Thanks.


On 12/06/2014 06:00 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 12/05/2014 02:54 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 06:58:29AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> For uapi, need try to let all macros have same value, and MADV_FREE is
>>> added into main branch recently, so need redefine MADV_FREE for it.
>>>
>>> At present, '8' can be shared with all architectures, so redefine it to
>>> '8'.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
>>
>>
>> Hello Chen,
>>
>> Thanks for looking at this.
>> Feel free to add my sign.
>>
>> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
>>
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
> Originally I sent the same patch like you sent (but later than yours).
> Geert suggested to use same value for MADV_FREE, and Carlos confirmed
> it and suggested more things (sorry, I forgot to Cc them in this mail).
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 


-- 
Chen Gang

Open share and attitude like air water and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ