[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141206000759.14606.qmail@ns.horizon.com>
Date: 5 Dec 2014 19:07:59 -0500
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To: rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...izon.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS needs <linux/bug.h>
It is possible to include <linux/kernel.h> and try to use
VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS, then puke because BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO
isn't defined.
I hit this via:
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
module_param(verbose, bool, 0);
IMHO, except in documented special cases, header files should
#include their own macros' dependencies.
Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
I'm not quite sure who to send this via. Rusty, you touched
VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS last. Should I send this via you, or collect
acks and include it in the patch series I'm working on that wants this?
The workaround is easy enough, but I'd rather fix it than let cruft
like this accumulate.
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index 3d770f55..afb81c1a 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/typecheck.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/dynamic_debug.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
#include <uapi/linux/kernel.h>
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists