linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] UBI: Fastmap: Don't allocate new ubi_wl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54856305.2070408@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:36:21 +0200
From:	Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, dedekind1@...il.com
CC:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] UBI: Fastmap: Don't allocate new ubi_wl_entry objects

On 11/30/2014 1:35 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> There is no need to allocate new ones every time, we can reuse
> the existing ones.
> This makes the code cleaner and more easy to follow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> ---
>   drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c | 31 +++++--------------------------
>   drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c      | 11 +++++++----
>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c
> index db3defd..9507702 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c
> @@ -1446,19 +1446,6 @@ int ubi_update_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi)
>   	}
>
>   	new_fm->used_blocks = ubi->fm_size / ubi->leb_size;

Not related to this patch, but looking at this function it got me 
thinking: why do we need to re-calculate new_fm->used_blocks (and check 
calculated value) each time? fm_size doesn't changed at runtime. 
leb_size sure does not, so fm->used_blocks can be ubi device parameter 
and calculated & tested only once, and not each time we write fastmap. 
Correct?


> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < new_fm->used_blocks; i++) {
> -		new_fm->e[i] = kmem_cache_alloc(ubi_wl_entry_slab, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!new_fm->e[i]) {
> -			while (i--)
> -				kfree(new_fm->e[i]);
> -
> -			kfree(new_fm);
> -			mutex_unlock(&ubi->fm_mutex);
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
>   	old_fm = ubi->fm;
>   	ubi->fm = NULL;
>


Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
-- 
Qualcomm Israel, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/