linux-kernel - RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: do retry operations with cond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <002101d012c9$a1d85460$e588fd20$@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:29:53 +0800
From:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To:	'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: do retry operations with cond_resched

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 3:56 AM
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: do retry operations with cond_resched
> 
> This patch revists retrial paths in f2fs.
> The basic idea is to use cond_resched instead of retrying from the very early
> stage.
> 
> Suggested-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>

> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  7 +++++++
>  fs/f2fs/gc.c      |  5 ++---
>  fs/f2fs/node.c    | 41 +++++++++--------------------------------
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c |  5 ++---
>  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index c873140..c787fe3 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1021,6 +1021,13 @@ retry:
>  	return entry;
>  }
> 
> +static inline void f2fs_radix_tree_insert(struct radix_tree_root *root,
> +				unsigned long index, void *item)
> +{
> +	while (radix_tree_insert(root, index, item))
> +		cond_resched();
> +}
> +
>  #define RAW_IS_INODE(p)	((p)->footer.nid == (p)->footer.ino)
> 
>  static inline bool IS_INODE(struct page *page)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index 2c58c58..eec0933 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -356,12 +356,11 @@ static void add_gc_inode(struct gc_inode_list *gc_list, struct inode
> *inode)
>  		iput(inode);
>  		return;
>  	}
> -retry:
>  	new_ie = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(winode_slab, GFP_NOFS);
>  	new_ie->inode = inode;
> -
> +retry:
>  	if (radix_tree_insert(&gc_list->iroot, inode->i_ino, new_ie)) {
> -		kmem_cache_free(winode_slab, new_ie);
> +		cond_resched();
>  		goto retry;
>  	}

use f2fs_radix_tree_insert instead?

Thanks,
Yu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/