[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141208110714.GN6043@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:07:14 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: when stealing freepages, also take pages
created by splitting buddy page
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 06:12:56PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> When __rmqueue_fallback() is called to allocate a page of order X, it will
> find a page of order Y >= X of a fallback migratetype, which is different from
> the desired migratetype. With the help of try_to_steal_freepages(), it may
> change the migratetype (to the desired one) also of:
>
> 1) all currently free pages in the pageblock containing the fallback page
> 2) the fallback pageblock itself
> 3) buddy pages created by splitting the fallback page (when Y > X)
>
> These decisions take the order Y into account, as well as the desired
> migratetype, with the goal of preventing multiple fallback allocations that
> could e.g. distribute UNMOVABLE allocations among multiple pageblocks.
>
> Originally, decision for 1) has implied the decision for 3). Commit
> 47118af076f6 ("mm: mmzone: MIGRATE_CMA migration type added") changed that
> (probably unintentionally) so that the buddy pages in case 3) are always
> changed to the desired migratetype, except for CMA pageblocks.
>
> Commit fef903efcf0c ("mm/page_allo.c: restructure free-page stealing code and
> fix a bug") did some refactoring and added a comment that the case of 3) is
> intended. Commit 0cbef29a7821 ("mm: __rmqueue_fallback() should respect
> pageblock type") removed the comment and tried to restore the original behavior
> where 1) implies 3), but due to the previous refactoring, the result is instead
> that only 2) implies 3) - and the conditions for 2) are less frequently met
> than conditions for 1). This may increase fragmentation in situations where the
> code decides to steal all free pages from the pageblock (case 1)), but then
> gives back the buddy pages produced by splitting.
>
> This patch restores the original intended logic where 1) implies 3). During
> testing with stress-highalloc from mmtests, this has shown to decrease the
> number of events where UNMOVABLE and RECLAIMABLE allocations steal from MOVABLE
> pageblocks, which can lead to permanent fragmentation. It has increased the
> number of events when MOVABLE allocations steal from UNMOVABLE or RECLAIMABLE
> pageblocks, but these are fixable by sync compaction and thus less harmful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Assuming the tracepoint issue Joonsoo pointed out gets corrected;
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
I'm kicking myself that I missed the effect of 47118af076f6 when I was
reviewing it. I knew allocation success rates were worse than they used
to be but had been blaming changes in aggression of reclaim and
compaction.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists