[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141208222641.40a64946@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:26:41 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
Hi Christian,
After merging the acess_once tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'find_linux_pte_or_hugepte':
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:981:3: error: invalid initializer
pud = ACCESS_ONCE(*pudp);
^
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:993:4: error: invalid initializer
pmd = ACCESS_ONCE(*pmdp);
^
These are preexisting ...
mm/gup.c: In function 'gup_pmd_range':
mm/gup.c:929:3: error: invalid initializer
pmd_t pmd = ACCESS_ONCE(*pmdp);
^
mm/gup.c:929:3: error: (near initialization for 'pmd')
This is from commit f30c59e921f1 ("mm: Update generic gup
implementation to handle hugepage directory") from the powerpc-mpe (and
powerpc) tree and so will require a merge fix patch (presumable
s/ACCESS_ONCE/READ_ONCE/).
I am not sure how many architectures you are trying to cover, but
powerpc is one I care about :-)
I have dropped the access_once tree again today, sorry (its too late at
night).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists