linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: compute wait_ioctl timeout correctly

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <87lhmimiac.fsf@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:34:51 +0200
From:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: compute wait_ioctl timeout correctly

On Thu, 04 Dec 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> We've lost the +1 required for correct timeouts in
>
> commit 5ed0bdf21a85d78e04f89f15ccf227562177cbd9
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date:   Wed Jul 16 21:05:06 2014 +0000
>
>     drm: i915: Use nsec based interfaces
>
>     Use ktime_get_raw_ns() and get rid of the back and forth timespec
>     conversions.
>
>     Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>     Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
>     Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
>
> So fix this up by reinstating our handrolled _timeout function. While
> at it bother with handling MAX_JIFFIES.
>
> v2: Convert to usecs (we don't care about the accuracy anyway) first
> to avoid overflow issues Dave Gordon spotted.
>
> v3: Drop the explicit MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET check, usecs_to_jiffies should
> take care of that already. It might be a bit too enthusiastic about it
> though.
>
> v4: Chris has a much nicer color, so use his implementation.
>
> This requires to export nsec_to_jiffies from time.c.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@...el.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82749
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>

Pushed to drm-intel-next-fixes, thanks for the patch.

BR,
Jani.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++-
>  kernel/time/time.c              | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 049482f5d9ac..564a45f4a0ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3097,6 +3097,11 @@ static inline unsigned long msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(const unsigned int m)
>  	return min_t(unsigned long, MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET, j + 1);
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned long nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(const u64 n)
> +{
> +        return min_t(u64, MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET, nsecs_to_jiffies64(n) + 1);
> +}
> +
>  static inline unsigned long
>  timespec_to_jiffies_timeout(const struct timespec *value)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 9d362d320d82..04a9f26407ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1226,7 +1226,8 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
>  	if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	timeout_expire = timeout ? jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies((u64)*timeout) : 0;
> +	timeout_expire = timeout ?
> +		jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout((u64)*timeout) : 0;
>  
>  	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && ring->id == RCS && can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
>  		gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv);
> diff --git a/kernel/time/time.c b/kernel/time/time.c
> index a9ae20fb0b11..8fae82ca5cbf 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/time.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/time.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ u64 nsecs_to_jiffies64(u64 n)
>  	return div_u64(n * 9, (9ull * NSEC_PER_SEC + HZ / 2) / HZ);
>  #endif
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nsecs_to_jiffies64);
>  
>  /**
>   * nsecs_to_jiffies - Convert nsecs in u64 to jiffies
> -- 
> 1.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives