[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141208142217.GA1831@e104805>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:22:18 +0000
From: "Javi Merino" <javi.merino@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 6/9] thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power
cooling device API
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 01:31:35PM +0000, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 8 December 2014 at 18:20, Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com> wrote:
> > Is this loop pointless? I seem to recall that it was needed but I
> > forgot the details. If you think it is, I can remove it.
>
> Yes it is pointless. The CPUs you are iterating on, share clock lines
> and so they will have same set of OPPs. Just do this for the cpu
> we are registering the cooling device.
Ok, changed it into:
cpu = cpumask_any(&cpufreq_device->allowed_cpus);
dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
if (!dev) {
dev_warn(&cpufreq_device->cool_dev->device,
"No cpu device for cpu %d\n", cpu);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
}
num_opps = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(dev);
if (num_opps <= 0) {
ret = (num_opps < 0)? num_opps : -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
}
Thanks!
Javi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists