[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141208225519.64501d2d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:55:19 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, atull@...nsource.altera.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Ira Snyder <iws@...o.caltech.edu>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, philip@...ister.org,
rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
Jason <jason@...edaemon.net>, kyle.teske@...com,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, cesarb@...arb.net,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com,
Yves Vandervennet <yvanderv@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] fpga manager: framework core
On Sat, 6 Dec 2014 13:00:17 +0000
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> * /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/firmware
> >> Name of FPGA image file to load using firmware class.
> >> $ echo image.rbf > /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/firmware
> >
> > I .. still don't think this is good idea. What about namespaces?
> > The path corresponds to path in which namespace?
>
> I don't understand your concern here. This allows userspace to name
> the FPGA bitstream that the kernel will use during request_firmware(),
> and it will show up as the $FIRMWARE value in the uevent file, but it
> is still the responsibility of userspace to choose what to load, and
> it can freely ignore the setting of $FIRMWARE if it needs to.
I think the entire model here is basically pedicated on a bogus
assumption that an FPGA is a one shot device. It's not. It's a fast
reloadable reusable device. A lot of work being done with FPGAs in
operating systems already involves basically task switching and
scheduling FPGAs as a shared resource pool. Trying to nail something
together with request_firmware is several years behind the curve.
>From userspace it needs to be a open, load, use, close type model, not a
static or semi-static pile of mappings.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists