lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQX-vMu5+Kr09ngr95WvtoZTUSL5R2+NiVFeiN6q-BXLLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:59:54 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Kordík <kordikmarek@...il.com>,
	Alexey Voronkov <zermond@...il.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not
 support it

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 13:52 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> 2. or scan the children resource other than ROM to clear bridge MEM_64
>>    for mmio pref.
>>
>> The patch is using second way so will keep child mmio pref into bridge
>> mmio pref range.
>
> That means that having a single ROM BAR that is 32-bit and prefetchable
> will downgrade the entire window to 32-bit ? That's not going to work
> either.

the ROM BAR get skipped during the checking.

+                       if (i != PCI_ROM_RESOURCE)
+                               mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
+               }

>
> I have GPUs with 16G BARs for example... suddenly they don't fit
> anaymore because we downgraded the window to 32 bit because somewhere
> there's a 32-bit pref resource ?
>
> That will break more than it fixes...

Please check if this patch break your platform. I tried on my setup on
x86. and it is still
working on 64 bit resource allocation.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ