[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQX-vMu5+Kr09ngr95WvtoZTUSL5R2+NiVFeiN6q-BXLLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:59:54 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marek KordÃk <kordikmarek@...il.com>,
Alexey Voronkov <zermond@...il.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Clear bridge MEM_64 flag if one child does not
support it
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 13:52 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> 2. or scan the children resource other than ROM to clear bridge MEM_64
>> for mmio pref.
>>
>> The patch is using second way so will keep child mmio pref into bridge
>> mmio pref range.
>
> That means that having a single ROM BAR that is 32-bit and prefetchable
> will downgrade the entire window to 32-bit ? That's not going to work
> either.
the ROM BAR get skipped during the checking.
+ if (i != PCI_ROM_RESOURCE)
+ mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
+ }
>
> I have GPUs with 16G BARs for example... suddenly they don't fit
> anaymore because we downgraded the window to 32 bit because somewhere
> there's a 32-bit pref resource ?
>
> That will break more than it fixes...
Please check if this patch break your platform. I tried on my setup on
x86. and it is still
working on 64 bit resource allocation.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists