[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1418107460.15957.9.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:44:20 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Asaf Vertz <asaf.vertz@...demg.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, LW@...O-electronics.de,
B38611@...escale.com, maksqwe1@....net, jg1.han@...sung.com,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, fabf@...net.be,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: edt-ft5x06: fixed a macro coding style issue
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 08:34 +0200, Asaf Vertz wrote:
> Fixed a coding style error, macros with complex values should be
> enclosed in parentheses.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
[]
> @@ -849,10 +849,11 @@ static int edt_ft5x06_ts_identify(struct i2c_client *client,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) \
> +#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) { \
> if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low && \
> pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high) \
> - edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name)
> + edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name); \
> +}
Any time you see a naked if (foo) bar in a macro
prefer to use a do while (0) like;
#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) \
do { \
if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low && \
pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high) \
edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name); \
while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists