[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141209085205.GA28655@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:52:05 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: potential corruption in synclink driver
Hi Jiri, I hate to bother you with this, but you're the TTY expert. I'm
getting the following static checker warning:
drivers/tty/synclink.c:4057 save_tx_buffer_request()
error: 'BufferSize' from user is not capped properly
drivers/tty/synclink.c
4047 static int save_tx_buffer_request(struct mgsl_struct *info,const char *Buffer, unsigned int BufferSize)
4048 {
4049 struct tx_holding_buffer *ptx;
4050
4051 if ( info->tx_holding_count >= info->num_tx_holding_buffers ) {
4052 return 0; /* all buffers in use */
4053 }
4054
4055 ptx = &info->tx_holding_buffers[info->put_tx_holding_index];
4056 ptx->buffer_size = BufferSize;
4057 memcpy( ptx->buffer, Buffer, BufferSize);
^^^^^^^^^^
4058
4059 ++info->tx_holding_count;
4060 if ( ++info->put_tx_holding_index >= info->num_tx_holding_buffers)
4061 info->put_tx_holding_index=0;
4062
4063 return 1;
4064 }
ptx->buffer is allocated in mgsl_alloc_intermediate_txbuffer_memory()
and it can be up to "info->max_frame_size" bytes which is a number
between 4096 and 65535.
The way I read it, BufferSize comes from do_tty_write() and it could be
up to 65536. That's obviously one higher than 65535. But if
->max_frame_size is 4096 then that's a lot higher.
This looks like a potential buffer overflow but I don't know the TTY
layer enough to be sure.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists