linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v9 03/19] mfd: max77693: Modify flash cell name identifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <5486BE6C.9010408@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:18:36 +0100
From:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, pavel@....cz, cooloney@...il.com,
	rpurdie@...ys.net, sakari.ailus@....fi, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v9 03/19] mfd: max77693: Modify flash cell name
 identifiers

On 12/09/2014 09:52 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2014, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>
>> Change flash cell identifiers from max77693-flash to max77693-led
>> to avoid confusion with NOR/NAND Flash.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mfd/max77693.c |    4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77693.c b/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
>> index a159593..cb14afa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
>> @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ static const struct mfd_cell max77693_devs[] = {
>>   		.of_compatible = "maxim,max77693-haptic",
>>   	},
>>   	{
>> -		.name = "max77693-flash",
>> -		.of_compatible = "maxim,max77693-flash",
>> +		.name = "max77693-led",
>> +		.of_compatible = "maxim,max77693-led",
>
> This is fine by me, so long as you've been through the usual
> deprecation procedures or this platform is still WiP.

It was me who added of_compatible for max77693-flash, but the
related led driver has not been yet merged and there are no
other drivers depending on it.

Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/