[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokBVH2gnqBrDffPMcsYx6BNKFvMWkNM4D3DzU8nxb=-xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:06:46 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 6/9] thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power
cooling device API
On 9 December 2014 at 16:02, Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com> wrote:
> Sorry but I don't follow. __cpufreq_cooling_register() is passed a
> clip_cpus mask, not a single cpu. How do I get "the cpu for which
> __cpufreq_cooling_register() is called" if not by looping through all
> the cpus in the mask?
Yeah, its np that is passed instead of cpu number. So, that wouldn't
be usable. Also because of the limitations I explained earlier, it makes
sense to iterate over all clip_cpus and finding which one owns OPPs.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists