lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:53:05 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>, "a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>, "ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>, "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:27:08AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:18:56PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:49:52PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > > Jiri Wrote: > > > > > > looks ok to me.. > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > > > > > > > > I'll test it once I get hands on Haswel server again, I guess we > > > > > > wait for the kernel change to go in first anyway, right? > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure, let's ask Peter. > > > > > > > > > Peter? > > > > > > > > Would be good to go in one pull request, so that whoever pulls it has > > > > the chance to test the kernel feature with the accompanying tooling bits. > > > > > > also there's user part dependency on kernel.. soem new define IIRC > > > > > > > Oh, right. We have to let them go in together. > > > > Hi Peter, > > The ones that are just prep patches I am merging now, Jiri, can I stick > an Acked-by to the non-LBR related ones? I guess u mean just this one? 2803 T Dec 02 kan.liang@...el (3.4K) ├─>[PATCH V5 2/3] perf tool: Move cpumode resolve code to add_callchain_ip yep, ack jirka > > > I have verified that the V8 kernel part patch is compatible with both latest > > tip and latest perf/core. We don't need to rebase. > > The user perf tool for tip is not updated yet. We need to merge latest > > perf/core to tip before applying user part patch. > > > > Do you have more comments for the code? > > > > The latest kernel and user part codes are here. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/432 > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/396 > > > > Thanks, > > Kan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists