[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1418132328.19339.9.camel@AMDC1943>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:38:48 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm tree
On wto, 2014-12-09 at 14:09 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got a conflict in
> drivers/dma/pl330.c between commits ae43b3289186 ("ARM: 8202/1:
> dmaengine: pl330: Add runtime Power Management support v12") and
> b816ccc5c01f ("ARM: 8206/1: dmaengine: pl330: Add PM sleep support")
> from the arm tree and commits 86e15941d3f5 ("dmaengine: pl330: Split
> device_control") and c9a09dacf851 ("dmaengine: pl330: Declare slave
> capabilities for the generic code") from the slave-dma tree.
>
> I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
Looks almost good:
++ pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pl330->ddma.dev);
++ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pl330->ddma.dev);1
^here
However I am looking current next (fetched few minutes ago and the one
visible through gitweb) and I can see only mi changes (related to PM
runtime). It looks like slave-dma changes got lost on the way.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists